Thanks Jay. It is actually sounding like I'm just intending to need to experiment somewhat much like each other load. Was hoping to avoid wasting just a little time with a printed recipie but the powder makers dont appear to like goobering up their high$$$ check barrels woth moly.
I looked at Hogdon's relative melt away fee chart & H335 appears to get quite a bit speedier than CFE. Varget and BL-C2 seem like much like CFE with regard to burn price.
That is why I don't shop for off brand deal bullets, and why I do not buy bullets from manufacturers that do not provide data or a minimum of information and recommendations like Xtreme does.
Posted: 5/3/2016 seven:forty seven:48 AM EDT [#9] I have been striving CFE223 with a few 55 grain bullets. Still dealing with it. I'm able to declare that It appears to "feed" pretty well. I have been working with my Hornady Digital powder evaluate/scale even though Doing work up my loads. The CFE223 feeds so rapid the powder evaluate won't be able to precisely meter it (the electronic a single). It offers me constant around alarms. Even utilizing the method button to slow down the metering greater than placing it in "sluggish" does not get the job done. I have not experimented with it in the normal powder evaluate still but be expecting It could be quite constant. I did, kind of Fortunate really, operate throughout an incredibly correct BLC2 load a couple range excursions again.
Then I exploit an outdated plastic pistol box cartridge holder (many manufacturing facility ammo arrived with plastic "trays" in the box.
I do have a little little bit of practical experience with CFE 223. I have a Hornady Digital powder evaluate/scale I take advantage of for the hard powders (like IMR4198 - my favourite .223 powder for compact teams) that just is not going to throw consistent charges through a powder evaluate. check here I bought a 1 lb. bottle of CFE223 to test with 55 grain bullets. I applied that Digital measure/scale Which powder drove that electronic unit wild. Wild? For a few motive that powder stored giving me overweight fees.
LIL'GUN® - Innovative technological innovation propellant layout only for the 410 BORE. The 410 shotshell has extensive been hard to load as a result of shortcomings in powder fit, metering, and burning features.
Add to quotation Only present this person #seven · Feb seven, 2021 I wouldn’t be worried about loading gentle. I assumed the identical factor but I are actually surprised by how mild my Garand and my AR15’s can handle and even now be trustworthy.
�That rifle around the wall in the labourer's cottage or Doing the job course flat is the image of democracy. It is actually our career to check out that it stays there.� George Orwell
Posts: 455 in between H335 and CFE 223 ? I've applied equally, in both equally scenarios precision variances were being negligible. Small enough accountable over the person powering the bring about. I choose H335 nevertheless, generally for the reason that I run it in numerous platforms. Kimber84
Base line is that for plinking ammo, I wouldn't switch Unless of course you need to get a pair much more FPS for a similar charge fat or help save powder for the same velocity (will not likely save Substantially)
Kinda sorta. It can be approximated from Hodgdon's site data for his or her check powder loads within their examination barrel with their decision of bullet that the majority intently matches your bullet pounds. No matter whether that should fly within your gun or not, I can't guarantee, but I have an exponential calculation within an Excel file that will give you a type of crude assortment to operate as much as.
I loaded 55 grain Winchester tender point bullets, used standard CCI smaller rifle primers and Winchester circumstances for your test. I labored up loads to what I assumed had been max for my rifle which was twenty five grains of H322 and 26 grains of H335. These loads are quite warm but not as high as some of my reloading manuals list. What I found is that although H335 might be Among the most applied powders for that .
I had been beneath the effect that H335 is properly W748? Not so? Undoubtedly is effective just like it in my 223AI.